Were You Arrested in Texas and Need Help? Check Out Our FAQs

A face-to-face meeting with Walter Reaves will help answer all of your questions, but until then, here are a few of the most frequently asked questions we hear.

  • Page 3
  • Can I get deferred adjudication in a DWI case?

    One of the most common questions I hear is whether you can be placed on "deferred adjudication" for driving while intoxicated. The simple answer is NO.

    If you don't know, deferred adjudication is a form of supervision - i.e. probation. The conditions of supervision are basically the same; the difference is in what happens in the end. In regular probation cases, you will complete the period of supervision and be released. That is basically the end of it. You still have a criminal conviction, and it will still appear on your arrest record.

    Deferred adjudication differs in what happens when you are originally placed on supervision. Instead of finding you guilty the court "defers" a finding of guilt. In other words, they don't find you guilty, and instead carry the case forward while you are on supervision. If you successfully  complete supervision the charges are dismissed. You can then truthfully say you have never been convicted of a criminal offense. In some cases, you can also obtain an "Order of Non-Disclosure", which basically seals your record.

    Unfortunately, the legislature has taken away the ability to receive deferred adjudication in a DWI case. There are a few other cases where you cannot receive deferred, but most of those are serious felonies. Chalk up DWI to influential lobbying groups.

    It's important to know that a conviction for driving while intoxicated is an offense with some significant collateral consequences. The inability to obtain deferred adjudication is simply one of those.

  • Should I take a polygraph?

    If you are the target of an investigation - i.e. a suspect - you might be asked to take a polygraph. Should you take one or not? As you might guess - since this is advice from a lawyer - the answer is it depends.

    The answer usually depends on why they are asking you to do it. They might be convinced you are guilty and want you to take one and fail so they can get a confession out of you. Or they might hope to get a confession before you even take it. How do they do that? If you fail, they tell you the results and use all the interrogation techniques they have been taught - which is usually to convince you that you'll be better off - and feel better - if you just admit what you did. Some police polygraphers also talk with the person before they even take the test, and convince them they would better off confessing before they take the polygraph and flunk it.

    Sometimes investigators do not know who to believe. While this situation is rare, they might want something to fall back on - which would be a polygraph. This may happen in cases where it's not clear what happened, and there are two or more people telling equally convincing stories.

    The problem with making this decision is that polygraphs are not always accurate - that's why they can't be used in court.  A recent story shows that one particular machine has a history of problems that have largely been ignored. That means that you might fail even if you are telling the truth. If you truly are innocent and you fail, you suddenly become a suspect.

    So do you look guilty if you refuse? Maybe - but what difference does it make? The police still have to investigate and obtain evidence. If you refuse they will probably look harder. On the other hand, you also appear guilty if you fail a polygraph - and most police officers won't even entertain the idea that the test was wrong.

    The decision to take a polygraph is not one you should take without talking to a lawyer. Generally, if I don't know anything about the investigation my advice is always going to be not to take one. If I'm convinced the police simply want to use the polygraph to eliminate the individual as a potential suspect I might be more inclined to recommend it; that's only if I don't think there's a possibility the investigation will re-focus on them if they fail. The decision is not one that should be made without knowing as much as you can about the evidence - both from the police and the client.

    Even if you do decide to take the polygraph, who administers it is important. It is best to have it done by someone not affiliated with law enforcement. It is even better to make arrangement for the test yourself.

    You probably have more questions now than when you started reading this. There's a reason for that - as I said at the beginning the answer is "it depends." You can only make the decision after knowing all the facts and evaluating the risks and rewards. An experienced lawyer is the best person to make that decision - it will be worth whatever you pay.

  • What are the differences between expunction and nondisclosure?

    Expunction and nondisclosure are both excellent opportunities for individuals who have a criminal offense on their record that they would like to see disappear (or disappear as much as possible). They give some people a second chance at functioning in society without a black mark on their criminal record. However, the two options are quite different in what they can actually offer someone.

    Expunction means that you can have a certain offense removed from your criminal record completely. After expunction, it’s as if the incident never happened. If you ever have to take the stand in another trial and you have to swear under oath that you've never been involved with the law, you can legally do that after an expunction. Expunctions can be very hard to get; they are generally given out in very specific, special circumstances. If you were arrested for a crime and never charged, or you were charged with a crime that was ultimately dismissed, you're probably eligible for an expunction.

    An order for nondisclosure does not wipe your record clean, but it does make it so that most people cannot access your record. Only some government officials will be permitted to examine your record. The incident covered by a nondisclosure order will not be public knowledge, and most people will never know about what happened with your legal troubles. A nondisclosure order is available for people who have successfully completed deferred adjudication and have received a discharge or dismissal of the deferred adjudication.

    If you think you may be eligible for a Texas expunction or a nondisclosure order, contact the Law Office of Walter Reaves in Waco at 254-296-0020.

  • What is the difference between simple assault and aggravated assault in Texas?

    When an individual is charged with a certain kind of assault, he may be confused as to what it actually all means. Were you charged with simple assault or aggravated assault, but you don't understand the difference between the two? Here are the basic differences:

    The biggest difference is that simple assaults are classified as misdemeanors, while aggravated assaults are classified as felonies. Misdemeanors carry small fines and little to no jail time, while felonies may be punished with significant fines and lengthy prison sentences. A felony can also affect a person's life forever, as it can ruin his chances at jobs, voting, buying firearms, and even traveling outside of the country.

    Simple assault encompasses minor injuries, touching, and threatening words or behavior. The alleged victim of the assault has to truly fear being hurt by the actions and words of the other person.

    Aggravated assault involves serious injuries or the addition of weapons into the equation. Even if someone aimed a gun at another person with no intention of pulling the trigger, that could be considered aggravated assault.

    The bottom line is that you don't want to be charged either with simple assault or with aggravated assault because neither one will have any kind of positive impact on your life. Texas takes assault cases very seriously, and you could face steep fines and jail time.

    If you have been charged with assault in Texas and would like help from a criminal defense attorney, contact Waco assault defense lawyer Walter Reaves for a free consultation by calling 254-296-0020.

  • I only had a very small amount of marijuana on me and I was still arrested. I thought it was decriminalized in Texas?

    Some states have decriminalized possessing small amounts of marijuana, but unfortunately for you, Texas is not one of them. In fact, Texas takes nearly every kind of drug arrest extremely seriously. Even if you're holding just a tiny bit of marijuana for a friend, if it's found in your possession, you could end up serving jail time.

    If you are found guilty of possessing two ounces or less of marijuana, you will most likely be convicted of a Class B Misdemeanor and can serve up to 180 days in jail and face up to a $2,000 fine. There's also a chance the judge will order drug treatment and/or community service. You will also lose your driver's license for 6 months or more.

    State Rep. Harold Dutton (D-Houston) has been trying to get House Bill 184 passed, but is meeting quite a bit of opposition. His proposed legislation would knock the charge for individuals with one ounce of marijuana or less down to a Class C misdemeanor, instead of being a Class B misdemeanor. That would mean, if convicted, a person would face a $500 fine and no jail time. Dutton sponsored an identical bill in the 2011-2012 legislative session, but the bill died in committee.

    There may not be much you can do to sway our state's lawmakers, but you can get a good drug crime attorney to take your case on. Many times, law enforcement officers violate search and seizure laws; if that is what happened in your situation, you may be able to get the charges thrown out. Contact Waco drug crime defense attorney Walter Reaves by calling 254-296-0020​ to schedule a free consultation.

  • What is an ignition interlock device?

    Use of an ignition interlock device is often one of the conditions and terms of a DWI conviction in Texas. If you've been convicted of two or more DWIs in a five-year period, you are required to outfit any vehicles you drive with this device. Also, depending on the severity of your DWI, you could be ordered to use the ignition interlock device even if is your first offense. That is really up to the judge when your sentencing is taking place.

    An ignition interlock device consists of a tube that feeds into electronic equipment attached to a vehicle’s ignition system. A driver must submit a breath sample before he is able to start the car. If the breath sample indicates a blood-alcohol concentration (BAC) over a specified limit, the car will not start. Additionally, the driver will be prompted to submit breath samples while he is driving, to make sure he did not start drinking after the car started.

    If someone is ordered to have an ignition interlock device installed, she is responsible for paying for the device and any installation charges, and must make sure installation is complete within 30 days. Any court-ordered installations have to be performed by service centers certified by the Department of Public Safety.

    In addition to having the ignition interlock device installed, the person must also obtain a restricted interlock license, which authorizes her to drive only if the device is installed. A restricted interlock license will not be issued if the individual's regular driver's license is expired or suspended, or if she has not paid the required fees.

    If you have been arrested for DWI and need help avoiding a conviction, contact Waco DWI defense lawyer Walter Reaves at 254-296-0020​ for a free consultation.

  • The offense I've been accused of is pretty minor and I think I should be fine. Do I still need a lawyer?

    It depends what you consider to be "minor," but there's a very good chance that you still need to consult with an experienced criminal defense attorney. Most attorneys, including our office, will offer free consultations—so you have nothing to lose by talking to a lawyer to find out how serious your case could actually be.

    It's easy to say you're going to represent yourself in court because you know you are innocent or because you think it's going to be quick and pretty cut-and-dried. However, when you actually set foot in that courtroom and your heart starts to pound, your palms get sweaty, and your mind starts to race, you begin to wonder why you thought it was a good idea to do this alone. Remember this: lawyers do this almost every single day. This is their job. Being convicted of a crime is stressful enough—don't put the entire weight of a trial on your own shoulders.

    We've met with people who say that if they go to court they will "just" be convicted of a misdemeanor. Yes, a misdemeanor is not as serious as a felony, but that doesn't mean it couldn't have a harsh impact on your life. Misdemeanors can carry fines and jail time; you could lose your license and ruin future job prospects.

    Did you know that in Texas, your first DWI conviction can carry many penalties, including a $1,000 per year surcharge that you have to pay for three years? Did you know that some drug cases also carry license suspensions? Or that a conviction for assault of family violence carries federal firearm restrictions?

    The point is, don't assume your crime isn't a big deal. An experienced criminal defense attorney on your side will make sure things go smoothly by fighting on your behalf.

    If you've been accused of a crime in the Waco area, contact Texas criminal defense attorney Walter Reaves at 254-296-0020​ for a free consultation.